Movie Propaganda - In the Shadow of the Moon - Spoilers!

Be warned; if you haven't seen this film, and plan to watch it, this review contains major spoilers.  Continue at your own discretion. 

SPOILER ALERT - CONTINUE AT YOUR OWN RISK.  NO COMPLAINING LATER!!


So, you've been warned, and now comes the review.  I went into this movie thinking it looked interesting.  The trailer looks pretty cool - 

 You see a plot that's intriguing, some mystery, suspense, and the acting doesn't look half bad.  Well, don't be fooled; that's all just to draw you in, and get you to watch their SJW propaganda piece.  Seriously, it's that bad.  Worse, you don't even realize till way too far into the movie that you're being manipulated, fed a lot of nonsense, to push an agenda.  In this case, the agenda is (no surprises for anyone paying attention these days) anti-white and anti-American.  Yes, both.  

The movie starts off alright, with a young cop, with aspirations of becoming a detective, trying to resolve some odd crimes.  He finds a connection between the way the victims are killed, but no connection between them otherwise.  His brother-in-law, played by Michael C. Hall of Dexter fame, plays an ambitious detective, who ends up being a minor role in the whole thing.  One victim, who doesn't die right away, mentions that the suspect seems abnormally strong, and we see that she moves very fast, and seems very capable, more than you'd think normal for a young woman.  Said suspect is a young black woman, in a hoodie, with very short hair.  Well, the suspect ends up in front of a train, and does not survive.  Before that, though, she talks about his daughter, who hasn't yet been born, and other odd details about his life, that she'd seemingly have no way of knowing.  The killings are bizarre, too, with a short order cook, a concert pianist, and a bus driver being the targets, all dying from sudden and unexplained hemorrhaging, with marks on the bacs of their necks.  Other than the one victim we see speak before she dies, an unknown dance club patron, there is no explanation of when the other people received said marks.  Since that woman stated this was painful, it's odd that this is left unexplained.  Plot hole #1.  When a description is given, we then see what seems to be half the young black women in Philly being arrested, as suspects, even though most don't fit the description very well.  All are photographed holding up their hands, since the suspect supposedly had an injured wrist.  "Hands up, don't shoot" reference, I am sure.  Smooth way to insert that one, since you almost don't notice.   In case I didn't mention it, all victims were white.  Ah, almost forgot, before all of this, we see a scene from the future, showing the town in tatters, no people round, alarms sounding.  Anyway, this tie ends with his wife giving birth, and dying, and him left to raise his daughter alone.  At one crime scene, a book about one of the Founding Fathers is seen lying on the street.

Fast forward to nine years later.  In the streets, there are protests, with people demanding "justice" for this poor black woman, unrightfully "thrown in front of a train" by a white cop.  Oh, yeah, it's a bit anti-cop too.  And, no, she wasn't thrown; she basically fell in front of it, and the cop was on the ground, after being attacked by her, at the time.  But, hey, why ruin a good protest with facts, right?   Then, to everyone's surprise, the killings start again.  Same method, and they have video of what seems to be the same woman, who is supposed to be dead.  The same cop, now a detective, cautions against revealing this information, but the lieutenant (his brother-in-law) does so anyway, and riots take place.  We are led to believe that releasing the information, and warning the public, was a bad idea, because black feeling would be hurt.  Hence the riots.  Not their fault, though; all the fault of the LT who held the press conference, right?  They re-examine the old evidence, apparently neglected after the suspect was killed, and find that a key fro back in '88 belongs to a plane not built till that current year, '97.  Weird, eh?  Cue the intense Indian physicist type, talking about time travel and moon phases, and claiming his research and the case seem to be connected.  No one wants to listen to him.  The cop and his partner (who just happens to be black) go to the airfield, where they expect to find a plane belonging to that key.  Parner lingers outside the fence, while the cop/detective vaults it, breaking the rules, to simply walk in and question a nighttime employee.  Because, gee, they couldn't just talk to the guy?  No reason to vault the fence is given, really.  Seems to be a "watch the white cop break the rules" sort of moment, and that's been happening throughout the movie.  Well, the night employee is acting strangely, and the cop figures someone is there, and they do a decent job of him subtly getting the truth, and then out pops the suspect.  Same woman, of course, even though she's supposed to be dead.  No explanation as to why she's there (plot hole #2), however, and no one killed there, and she ends up shooting and killing his partner, who walks in and surprises her, taking the cop into the plane, more odd dialogue occurs, with more hints of time travel, and then she tosses him from the plane.  Not super high, but not all that low, and he hits the water, should have died, somehow didn't.  LT is ticked at him, they can't locate her anywhere, though the plane is crashed on the beach where he comes ashore, and the case is cold again.  There are scenes showing him and the daughter, with him seeming to be not as connected as he could be, as though he's unable to function, even nine years later.  

Fast forward another nine years, and we find the now former cop, scruffy and bearded and looking homeless, still obsessed with the case, with his daughter being raised by her aunt and uncle.  While all around hi label him as crazy, he tracks down a victim they supposedly missed, as it was in another jurisdiction (never mind computer connections that would make this unlikely, even back then - plot hole #3),  and learns the guy was soe sort of "militant" sort, a supposed "white supremacist", though they are vague in stating that, and that he sent out his propaganda in books about the Founding Fathers.  "America is evil" is the clear message of the scene.  Then, stealing the badge of his brother-in-law, using it to get the address of the guy's former wife/GF, only to find her already hit by the same suspect, in the same fashion, he pursues her, shoots her in the wrist, supposedly accounting for the injury mentioned all those years earlier, and ends up following her into a drainage pipe, to a chamber containing what we can only assume is some sort of time machine.  She vanishes yet again.  
Another nine years into the future, the guy is living in his car, and his daughter is grown, and apparently married, and expecting a child.  The brother-in-law keeps telling the guy he needs help, and won't listen to his ideas.  We see that the Indian scientist (remember him?) is doing research on pigs, killing them by implanting devices in their necks, that can then cause the massive hemorrhaging and brain damage we saw in the victims, and he speaks of being able to do that across time someday.  At this stage, it's clear he's working to cause killings, not prevent them.  He seems quite gleeful.  When the former cop encounters the suspect yet again, by waiting outside the drain pipe, they have a conversation about who she is, and what she is doing, and it's revealed she is his granddaughter, and that he supposedly sent her on her mission.  The ission?  Oh, yeah, you'll love this - kill anyone who ever taught someone else an idea you don't like.  Yes, seriously.  Supposedly, "evil white supremacists" would, in the "near future", set of bombs across the nation, sparking a civil war, and causing millions of deaths.  No explanation as to how, or why, such a war would occur from an act of terrorism, but hey, it's white guys, so anything goes, right? Supposedly, kiling them wouldn't be enough; you have to kill the ideas, and the people who taught them to think as they do.  Parents, grandparents, teachers, politicians, whoever.  Killing all these people, who did nothing wrong, is stated to be a "good thing", because supposedly this would prevent bad things from happening down the line.  The whole message is that, if you disagree with what someone thinks, you can kill them and it's justified.  Same sort of BS that Antifa types and others push, that anyone who doesn't agree with them is an enemy to be destroyed.  And, we are apparently supposed to applaud this nonsense.  

Well, not happening.  The movie only has about a 61% rating on Rotten Tomatoes, and most user reviews I've read state that the SJW political BS is glaring, and pan the movie.  I a sure most stupid critics liked it, because it fits their hateful intolerant worldview.  Hate white people, hate America, hate cops, and on and on.   Through all of this, we are given no explanation for her supposed great strength or speed - plot hole #3 - and no real explanation of any of the supposed science behind the time travel/moon phase connection, or any real explanation of how all of these people were supposedly evil, though a few were stated to have been on the mailing list of the "white supremacist".  Anyone could be killed, because they might teach someone the "wrong things", and riots are a valid means of silencing information, and cops are bad, and white people are bad, and America is bad, and all of this can be stopped by a black girl with a guy's haircut, who is, of course, 
killed by her white grandfather.   

That most of this BS isn't revealed until nearly the end of the movie was clever, I'll give credit, and the acting wasn't terrible, but the whole story is full of plot holes, and the political motivations make the entire thing disappointing in the extreme.  What happens when some idiot fans of this nonsense, already bolstered by their own BLM or Antifa ties, decide to go around killing innocent people, because those people support the president, or are white, or fly a flag outside their homes, or whatever?  Will the idiots that made this film be held responsible for inciting violence?  Because, make no mistake, that is exactly what they are doing.  Right before an election, too.  This isn't the only film pushing radical Leftist ideas, either.  I've read about some others.  

Remember, these are the same people that want to disarm you, to silence you with labels, to control everything your children learn.  Because, gee, tolerance means killing off the opposition, right?  Oh, wait... 

Halloween isn't Pagan At All; Melting Pot American Holiday

Yeah yeah, I've heard it all before; the claims that Halloween is based on old Celtic traditions, it's about worshiping the devil, and so forth.  The problem is, that simply isn't true.  A study of the actual history shows that much of what you've likely been told about this day isn't accurate.  Now, I don't care if someone decides to celebrate the day or not, or participate in activities, but I do care when people piously claim that their not doing so is because they are better, more Christian, or whatever, than those who do participate.  That's virtue signaling, and it isn't accurate or even very Christian.  For those who claim to warn others of the supposed dangers, I'd suggest they learn the real facts first.

The ancient Celts in Ireland and Britain did celebrate on October 31, a very minor day, but they also celebrated on the last day of most months of the year.  That particular one wasn't all that special. and that celebration isn't why Halloween is on that date.  The truth is, the celebration of All Saints Day was moved by Pope Gregory III, to coincide with the dedication of a chapel at St. Peter's, in Rome.  So, November 1 became All Saints Day not to coincide with any Celtic holidat at all, but for a completely different reason.  A later Pope, Gregory I, commanded that all observe the day, so the practice spread to Ireland. Later, some began to speculate on what happened to those who were not in heaven, and started to bang pots and pans to show those people weren't forgotten, and to hopefully discourage them from causing trouble.  A bit superstitious, perhaps, but hardly pagan.  The Bible certainly speaks of spiritual matters, and even mentions one case of someone perhaps speaking from beyond the grave.  Some debate this, but the truth is, we really don't know for certain.

The costumes come from France, where people began to dress up after the Black Death, as a reinder of mortality.  That happened on All Saints, however, not All Hallows Eve.  In America, when the different cultures became intermingled, so did the different practices, and costumes became associated with Halloween, instead.

The candy is likely from practices to celebrate Guy Fawkes, when revelers would wear masks and demand refreshments, on November 5, which in America ended up on Halloween because no one cared about Guy Fawkes, but demanding treats from neighbors, while all costumes, is a lot of fun for the kids.  So, the time shifted to Halloween, with the costumes and the fears of spirits, and the candy all combining in a purely American way, to create a fun holiday for kids to pretend, to get some treats, and to just be kids.  Adults enjoy the games, too, quite often, with costume parties and the like.

Ah, you say, but what about witches and jack-o-lanterns?  Well, some old harvest festivals included turnip lamps, so in true American fashion, those were borrowed, and pumpkins are far more fun to carve, and larger, so they were the American choice.  Witches were tossed in by the greeting card industry, in an attempt to sell creepy cards for Halloween.  Not really much of a thing, but they tried.

Surprise: Halloween's Not a Pagan Festival After All

In fact, we have very little real historical information about Celtic traditions at all.  Modern self-proclaimed witches might claim that they celebrate Samhain, we have no data on what actually happened during such celebrations, and those who used such claims to sell books were speculating, and that isn't a good reason to go along and agree with them.  How often do we see books sold today, based on claims of this or that, supposedly some issue of "faith", that are nothing but speculation to make a buck?  The books on claimed parallels between ancient mythology and Christianity are no more accurate than those offering dire predictions based on "blood moons".  So, please, use some common sense, folks. 

Guess what? Halloween is more Christian than Pagan

How Trick-or-Treating Became a Halloween Tradition

There is no reason whatsoever, other than personal choice, to not have fun on this holiday.  You can use it to remember that there are dangerous consequences for the unsaved, unrepentant sinners, to just have fun, or whatever, but you don't need to worry that it's some sort of devil worship.  Even if there are some similarities to older practices, none of those were about devil worship, by any means.  That's nothing but nonsense, made up to scare people, and draw them in to church activities.  Now, I have nothing against churches offering safe alternatives, because there are some concerns about safety, and in some places, those might be better choices, but that's not the same as having those because the day is somehow "evil".  So, let your kids have fun.  Carve a jack-o-lantern (we did last night), pick out costumes (parents should have some final say in choices for those, of course), take the kids trick or treating (and be sure to inspect the candy), have a party if you want, decorate, watch a scary movie, and relax.  It's a natural thing to think about the dead at this time of year, with the season changing, leaves falling, and the world seeming to go into a more "dead" state.   Recognizing that death is a part of life isn't wrong, and is part of the whole cycle.  In Spring, we celebrate life, and resurrection.  So, in Fall (Autumn if you prefer), we can remember the other part of that. 

Disrespecting Graves??

Veteran Flag Holders Stolen from Graves at Indiana Cemetery

About 40 veteran flag holders were reportedly stolen from graves at a cemetery in La Porte, Indiana, this week.

President of the Cemetery Board, Scott Harris, called the police and told them that the flag holders, which are valued at $40 each, had been taken sometime between Friday and Monday.
“Veteran grave markers have been stolen from area cemeteries in the past. According to previous reports, about 50 grave markers were stolen from the Patton Cemetery in 2015 and about a dozen bronze markers were stolen from Rolling Prairie Cemetery in 2012,” the La Porte County Herald-Argus noted.
Each of the flag holders was unique to a veteran’s grave and was purchased by members of that veteran’s family. The holders also represented the different kinds of service, according to WSBT.
“We just want to try and get these items back for the families, because like I said, you can’t get more disrespectful than actually taking from a grave site from someone that served our country,” said Captain Bill Degnegaard of the La Porte City Police Department.
“And this is something the families like to do to honor our veterans, and we would like to get those items back for them,” he concluded.
Many of the flags that were previously in the holders are now lying on the ground.
Patton Cemetery Board Vice President and Center Township Trustee Lisa Peurzakowski said she is saddened by the recent incident.
“This is sad because these men and women went to war for us so that we could have the freedom that we have now,” she commented. “And for somebody to come and take those emblems that were there, put there by the different organizations, steal them and probably scrap them for money, we have no idea, but it’s really sad that it’s come down to where they have to start doing stuff like that.”
On Wednesday, the La Porte Police Department asked anyone with information about the flag holders to contact the department at 219-362-9446.
However, Peurzakowski said this is not the first time Patton Cemetery has had trouble keeping people off of the property at night. She also noted that someone had dumped trash there before.
“It looks like we’re going to have to work on something else. We don’t have any electricity out here, but there’s got to be a way of maybe putting cameras somehow,” she commented.
Peurzakowski also noted that the theft will be probably be discussed at an upcoming board meeting.

What sort of complete scum does something like this?  Why?  Disrespect to the veterans?  Profit?  What's the motive here?  They need to set up trail cams, and catch these scumbags, lock them in a room somewhere, and throw away the room.   Why steals from a grave?? 

Good Deed from a Good Man

Gary Sinise Foundation Donates Smart Home to Wounded Veteran

A wounded Iraq war veteran and his wife were welcomed into their nearly-finished smart home on Wednesday in Colorado.

Retired U.S. Air Force Tech. Sgt. Matthew Slaydon and his wife, Annette, did not hold back their tears when 50 community members cheered as they stepped into their new house in Bayfield.
“I plan on living the rest of my life here, and I plan on paying this forward,” Slaydon commented during the Walls of Honor event. “I’ve got so many people that don’t have any scars, but they’re so horribly wounded still, that I want to share this with.”
The mortgage-free home was donated by the Gary Sinise Foundation along with other donors and specially designed to meet all of Slaydon’s needs.
The house will give him independent mobility so he can enjoy every inch of the property, according to his wife.
“Matt’s going to be able to wander this property on his own, which is something he hasn’t done in 12 years,” she said. “It’s really important, as we sit here and say thank you today, that you can really understand what a difference this is making in people’s lives.”
During his third deployment in Baghdad in 2007, a roadside bomb filled with nails and wood screws exploded two feet away from Slaydon, which caused him to lose his left arm and left eye. He now lives with bilateral blindness.
“Through his recovery process, Matthew was inspired to keep going because of his sense of duty, his family, and his military brothers and sisters. His wife, Annette, was by his side through the entire process,” the foundation’s website stated.
On Thursday, the foundation tweeted a photo of Slaydon and his wife inside their future home:

https://twitter.com/GarySiniseFound/status/1187474824148353031

“This house is going to have all this technology in it to be able to help him live a more full and happy life here,” said foundation spokesman Chris Kuban.
“It’s all about helping veterans to help other veterans. We can’t change every veteran’s life, but we can change this veteran’s life,” he concluded.
Once the house is completed, the Slaydons plan to move from their current home in Phoenix to the new house in May.

Awesome thing, and typical for Mr Sinise.  He does a lot for the military people and veterans.  Solid fellow, and nice.  I had chance to be on stage at one of his concert events, and he's really a cool guy.  Nicely done,sir.  Much appreciated, from all military and veterans.  Good to know some people care.

 

A Lack of Honor

China Disqualified for ‘Extensive Cheating’ at Military World Games

China’s entire national orienteering team was kicked out of the Military World Games on Friday because it was caught cheating, apparently with the assistance of spectators.

Orienteering is essentially a combination of long-distance running and pathfinding. Contestants are expected to navigate across difficult terrain as quickly as possible using a map and compass, visiting a series of control points along the way.
According to the International Orienteering Federation (IOF), the Chinese team took a number of top spots in both men’s and women’s orienteering at the Military World Games, which are being held in the central Chinese city of Wuhan. The games drew about 10,000 athletes, coaches, and officials.
After the competition, administrators discovered the Chinese athletes were “illegally aided by spectators and had used markings and small paths prepared for them during Sunday’s race,” as the BBC put it. The results of the orienteering competition were annulled after complaints from other teams.
The IOF rejected an appeal from China and stated the entire competition was “unfortunately overshadowed by extensive cheating by the Chinese team.”
“The Ministry of Defence, whose People’s Liberation Army are joint organisers of the games, did not immediately respond to a request for comment,” AFP reported on Friday.
The UK Guardian cheekily suggested the Chinese orienteering team must have lost its moral compass and described the incident as a tremendous embarrassment for China, which was hosting the Military World Games for the first time. The opening ceremony on October 18 was presided over by Chinese Communist Party leader Xi Jinping.
“News of the disqualification was not widely reported in Chinese media on Thursday, in contrast to reports this week celebrating the team’s wins,” the Guardian noted.
AFP noted that Chinese athletes have recently been caught taking shortcuts and using bicycles in marathon races, while the BBC recalled three Chinese runners getting banned for life from the Boston Marathon in April for rules infractions, including the use of forged paperwork to get into the race.

Wow.  They have displayed a complete lack of honor.   Where is their moral standard?  No honor code in their military?  I am disgusted.  They are on their own lands, too, and cannot win without cheating?  At orienteering?  It's not really complicated!  At all.  Yet they needed markings and paths set for themselves?  Sad, that.  If this is the best their military can manage, I am not worried about them as any sort of real threat.  How would they find their way to the fight?

"Because you'd be in jail." - FISA Abuse Probe Near Completion

IG Horowitz: Highly Anticipated FISA Abuse Probe Report ‘Near Completion’

Michael Horowitz, the U.S Department of Justice’s (DOJ) inspector general (IG), said Thursday that he is almost done finalizing the report into possible abuses of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) ahead of the 2016 presidential election.

Horowitz made the revelation in an October 24 letter addressed to House and Senate leaders.

The IG anticipated that the report would be released to the public with “a few redactions,” adding:

    "Given that our draft report is lengthy, and concerns sensitive national security and law enforcement matters, we understood that it would take the Department and the FBI some time to work through and appropriately mark the entire report. I can report to you that the [finalizing] process is ongoing and nearing completion, and we are working through these issues constructively with both the Department and the FBI."

    …

    "After we receive the final classification markings from the Department and the FBI, we will then proceed with our usual process for preparing a final report, including ensuring that appropriate reviews occur for accuracy and comment purposes. Once begun, we do not anticipate the time for that review to be lengthy."

Several news outlets obtained Horowitz’s letter. The DOJ IG has been conducting a parallel probe to the one focused on the origins of the Russian collusion hoax, which recently became a criminal investigation. Both investigations are related.

In March 2018, Horowitz launched the review of FISA abuses at the behest of lawmakers and then-Attorney General Jeff Sessions. Horowitz examined whether the FBI violated FISA when it sought surveillance of Carter Page, a former Trump campaign aid, back in 2016 in relation to the “Russian collusion” probe.

Fox News noted:

    "Partially redacted versions of the FBI’s FISA warrant to surveil Page revealed that the FBI relied on a largely discredited dossier written by British ex-spy Christopher Steele that was funded by the Hillary Clinton campaign and Democratic National Committee. But, the FBI apparently obscured that fact in its warrant application, telling the secret court only that the dossier was prepared at the behest of an unidentified presidential campaign."

The surveillance of Page prompted Trump and his Republican allies to accuse the Obama administration of spying, or even committing treason, against former top law enforcement officials. In April, Attorney General William Barr told lawmakers he believes the FBI spied on the Trump campaign.

Barr is currently reviewing the draft of Horowitz’s report. Horowitz’s investigation is expected to animate congressional hearings and investigations.

“As soon as Horowitz is done with his review of the FISA warrant application, the counterintelligence investigation, the Trump campaign, we’ll have a hearing in public with Horowitz and we’ll call a bunch of witnesses,” Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) told the Fox Business Network last Sunday.

President Trump has been anticipating the DOJ IG’s report.

“The IG report is going to come out soon, and we’ll see what happens,” Trump told reporters last week.

“But, I predict you will see things that you don’t even believe, the level of corruption … Let’s see whether or not it’s President Obama. Let’s see whether or not they put that in,” he added.

Trump has the authority to declassify and release the DOJ IG report. Horowitz’s letter announcing the prospective release of the FISA abuse probe report came amid House Democrats’ impeachment investigation.

That's the article for you.  Let's see, yes, if the responsible party is actually named.  We know he was involved.   I want to see that happen.  I lot of people don't want to see it happen, though, and are throwing fits:

Malcolm Nance: Trump May Be After Obama, Biden, Clinton, Brennan — ‘Ultimate Distraction to Steal an Election’

In the article, the panicked MSNBC analyst states:

WARNING: I heard a DC rumor fm a close Trump source in May 2017 he wanted to charge Obama, Biden, Brennen & Clinton w/treason over Russia. Now with Barr as AG this may be crazy but viable. It could incite civil unrest…the ultimate distraction to help steal an election,” Nance wrote on Twitter.

Hey, bub; it's not crazy if it's true!  No one is above the law.  That includes the lawless twit that tried to destroy the country.  The facts are starting to be known now:

Michael Flynn’s Lawyers Claim Lisa Page Altered FBI Interview Record to Frame Him

Report: DOJ Review of Russia Probe Origins Is Now Criminal Investigation

That's why Dems are in such a frenzy, and trying to distract from all of this with a BS impeachment inquiry:

Report: Democrats Say ‘Whistleblower’s’ Testimony No Longer Needed

Yes, you read that correctly; they are claiming that the fabricated "whistle blower report", which is known to have been total BS, isn't even important, and they can just proceed anyway.  Anything to distract.  Even the NYT admits, by mistake, that this whole Ukranian thing was nonsense:

YT Confirms Ukraine Didn’t Know U.S. Froze Aid at Time of July 25 Call: ‘Can’t Have Quid Pro Quo With No Quo’

Enough already!  Let's focus on the real issues, which include spying on  presidential campaign and probable treason.  Let's get people locked up who did these thing.  The president stated plainly in a debate why Dems, Hillary specifically, didn't want him elected.  Because they'd be in jail!  Make it so, please!

A Lack of Honest Reporting, and Look Before You Leap, or Judge.

Located this article, and at first, it looks bizarre, and very bad for the woman arrested:

Ohio Mom Claims She Found Intruder Attempting to Bathe Her Toddler

An Ohio mother claims she was horrified when she discovered an intruder attempting to give her two-year-old son a bath inside her home.

Areica Hill told WCMH that she awoke to find a woman inside her home in Columbus on Wednesday attempting to give her son a bath.
“I get up and I walk to my door and the way my house is set up, I can look down the hall,” Hill said. “I see a white female lady, bent over the tub, with my 2-year-old in the tub.”
Hill said she snatched the woman away from her child, and her boyfriend restrained the alleged intruder until police arrived.
The woman, whom police identified as 22-year-old Elizabeth Hixon, was arrested and charged with burglary.
Hixon posted bond in Franklin County Municipal Court and was later released, according to court records.
Hixon’s mother reportedly told WCMH that her daughter “had good intentions” and that “her heart was in the right place.”
Hill said she has never met Hixon and “would like to see other charges filed against her.”
Prosecutors have not yet received the police investigation but will figure out which charges are appropriate once the investigation is in their hands, the Franklin County Prosecutor’s Office said in a statement.

It's not that  simple, however.  A link tot he original story reveals a bit more, and some crucial information:

Woman attempts to give 2-year-old bath in bizarre Franklinton break-in

COLUMBUS (WCMH) — A Columbus mother says she was horrified when she woke up and found another woman inside her home, getting ready to give her 2-year-old son a bath.
“I’ve never heard of anything like this,” Areica Hill said.
Hill told NBC4 that she awoke Wednesday morning to the sound of a dog barking in her home. 
“I get up and I walk to my door and the way my house is set up, I can look down the hall,” Hill explained. “I see a white female lady, bent over the tub, with my 2-year-old in the tub.”
Hill said she fought the woman off, and her boyfriend held the woman in place until the police arrived.
Elizabeth Hixon, 22, was arrested and charged with burglary.
An affidavit in the case, filed in Franklin County Municipal Court, said: “Ms. Hixon stated that she entered the residence, to provide care to a juvenile, which was outside the residence.”
On the phone, Hixon’s mother told NBC4 that her daughter had good intentions and that her heart was in the right place.
Hill said she had never met Hixon.
She plans to follow this case, as it moves forward.
“I would like to see other charges filed against her,” Hill stated.
Prosecutors have yet to receive the police investigation. Once they do, they will determine what charges are appropriate, according to Franklin County Prosecutor Ron O’Brien’s office.
Hixon has posted bond.

Note the crucial bit - the woman stated the child was outside, alone and unattended.  The mother as inside with her boyfriend, not husband, and didn't know her child was outside.  I'd guess the door was opened because they toddler went through it already.  I'd guess this woman really did have good intentions, and intended to save this household the hassles of a visit from CPS for child neglect, and has now been rewarded by being arrested.  I'd also guess that distracting from this truth is why the mother s demanding additional charges.  Where are the charges against her for her child being outside alone?  You can purchase locks that toddlers can't get through.  Note the racia angle, too.  The woman who was arrested is white, and the mother and toddler are black.  If that was reversed, would people be defending the woman arrested, saying she as just trying to help?  

A lot of people are assuming this woman is mentally ill, or a pedophile, and not even bothering to research the whole story first, or see that the child wasn't being properly attended by his mother.